[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: No to StowFS!

From: Michael Banck
Subject: Re: No to StowFS!
Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2006 02:10:15 +0100
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.9i

On Fri, Feb 03, 2006 at 01:58:54AM +0100, Alfred M. Szmidt wrote:
>    I do agree that such a behavior could be considered broken, but if
>    most of the programs do that I believe that the support for them
>    should be provided.
> And this is easy to do, provide /usr as a symbolic link to / if such
> support is needed.

Or you could frob bash's she-bang parsing.


Michael Banck
Debian Developer

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]