[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: No to StowFS!
From: |
Michael Banck |
Subject: |
Re: No to StowFS! |
Date: |
Fri, 3 Feb 2006 15:39:50 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.9i |
On Fri, Feb 03, 2006 at 02:29:41AM +0100, Alfred M. Szmidt wrote:
> Thing is that they are broken, figuring out where the interpeter is
> should always be done at compile/configure time. Having perl in
> /usr/local/bin is very common for example, and simply hardcoding it to
> /usr/bin will make things break.
A big point of hardcoding the path in system-critical scripts is that
admins installing random versions of perl and pythong in /local will not
be able to break them as they force the system installed version.
Michael
Re: No to StowFS!, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/02/02
Re: No to StowFS!, Gianluca Guida, 2006/02/02
- Re: No to StowFS!, Leonardo Pereira, 2006/02/02
- Re: No to StowFS!, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/02/03
- Re: No to StowFS!, Filip Brcic, 2006/02/04
- Re: No to StowFS!, Richard M. Stallman, 2006/02/06
- Re: No to StowFS!, Karl Berry, 2006/02/06
- Re: No to StowFS!, Karl Berry, 2006/02/06