[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: No to StowFS!

From: Gianluca Guida
Subject: Re: No to StowFS!
Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2006 19:46:48 +0100


On 2/3/06, Leonardo Pereira <leonardolopespereira@gmail.com> wrote:
> Possibilities to make a stowfsed system booting:

I was referring to *your* nowstowfs booting stuff, not mine.

As already said previously on this thread, stowfs is implemented as a
set of unionfs running, so no stowfs.static thing may happen. And btw,
where are details? :-)

>  Did you tried any of those options?

Basically yes. They all failed for a reason or another.

So your proposal, how would it boot? (details)

It was a type of people I did not know, I found them very strange and
they did not inspire confidence at all. Later I learned that I had been
introduced to electronic engineers.
                                                  E. W. Dijkstra

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]