[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: No to StowFS!
From: |
Richard M. Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: No to StowFS! |
Date: |
Sun, 05 Feb 2006 21:07:19 -0500 |
I do not think that keep a loop symlink of USR->/ is a good idea,
since you will never be able to do a "find / -name
*something*". So, we need to correct those scripts. (* There are
scripts with references to /usr/python or /usr/local/perl)
Doesn't find know enough not to follow symlinks to directories?
I would think it ought to.
find / -P -name FOO
What does -P do? I don't see it in the documentation of find
on my machine.
- Re: No to StowFS!, (continued)
Re: No to StowFS!, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/02/02
Re: No to StowFS!, Gianluca Guida, 2006/02/02
- Re: No to StowFS!, Leonardo Pereira, 2006/02/02
- Re: No to StowFS!, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/02/03
- Re: No to StowFS!, Filip Brcic, 2006/02/04
- Re: No to StowFS!,
Richard M. Stallman <=
- Re: No to StowFS!, Karl Berry, 2006/02/06
- Re: No to StowFS!, Karl Berry, 2006/02/06
- Re: No to StowFS!, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/02/07
- Re: No to StowFS!, Karl Berry, 2006/02/07
- Re: No to StowFS!, Richard M. Stallman, 2006/02/08
- Re: No to StowFS!, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2006/02/08
Re: No to StowFS!, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/02/07
Re: No to StowFS!, Richard M. Stallman, 2006/02/06
Re: No to StowFS!, Michael Heath, 2006/02/04
Re: No to StowFS!, Richard M. Stallman, 2006/02/06