[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: No to StowFS!
|
From: |
Karl Berry |
|
Subject: |
Re: No to StowFS! |
|
Date: |
Mon, 6 Feb 2006 16:09:52 -0600 |
I do not think that keep a loop symlink of USR->/ is a good idea,
I admit I'm not sure of all the context here, but is there some proposal
that /usr will not resolve in GNU? That seems impractical to me.
Virtually everything ever written uses /usr, one way or another.
- Re: No to StowFS!, (continued)
- Re: No to StowFS!, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/02/02
- Re: No to StowFS!, Gianluca Guida, 2006/02/02
- Re: No to StowFS!, Leonardo Pereira, 2006/02/02
- Re: No to StowFS!, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/02/03
- Re: No to StowFS!, Filip Brcic, 2006/02/04
- Re: No to StowFS!, Richard M. Stallman, 2006/02/06
- Re: No to StowFS!, Karl Berry, 2006/02/06
- Re: No to StowFS!,
Karl Berry <=
- Re: No to StowFS!, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/02/07
- Re: No to StowFS!, Karl Berry, 2006/02/07
- Re: No to StowFS!, Richard M. Stallman, 2006/02/08
- Re: No to StowFS!, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2006/02/08
- Re: No to StowFS!, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/02/07
- Re: No to StowFS!, Richard M. Stallman, 2006/02/06
- Re: No to StowFS!, Michael Heath, 2006/02/04
- Re: No to StowFS!, Richard M. Stallman, 2006/02/06
- Re: No to StowFS!, Filip Brcic, 2006/02/05
- Re: No to StowFS!, Gianluca Guida, 2006/02/05