[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: transition to automake'fied GNU Mach
From: |
Guillem Jover |
Subject: |
Re: transition to automake'fied GNU Mach |
Date: |
Thu, 26 Oct 2006 08:41:15 +0300 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) |
On Thu, 2006-10-26 at 00:24:09 +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> [Back on the list.]
> > >$ automake --version
> > automake (GNU automake) 1.4-p6
> >
> > >$ autoconf --version
> > autoconf (GNU Autoconf) 2.60a
>
> The ancient version of Automake is very likely the problem. How do you
> happen to have such an old version of Automake installed, but nearly the
> freshest one of Autoconf? In case you're using Debian or a derivative,
> installing the `automake1.9' or even (if already available)
> `automake1.10' package would be the thing to do. Please try that first,
> before I start poking through the files you sent me.
If running unstable, the package automake was just uploaded, which
contains version 1.10.
regards,
guillem
- transition to automake'fied GNU Mach, Constantine Kousoulos, 2006/10/25
- Re: transition to automake'fied GNU Mach, Thomas Schwinge, 2006/10/25
- Re: transition to automake'fied GNU Mach, Constantine Kousoulos, 2006/10/25
- Message not available
- Re: transition to automake'fied GNU Mach, Thomas Schwinge, 2006/10/25
- Re: transition to automake'fied GNU Mach,
Guillem Jover <=
- Re: transition to automake'fied GNU Mach, Constantine Kousoulos, 2006/10/26
- Re: transition to automake'fied GNU Mach, Michael Banck, 2006/10/26
- Re: transition to automake'fied GNU Mach, Constantine Kousoulos, 2006/10/26
- Re: transition to automake'fied GNU Mach, Constantine Kousoulos, 2006/10/26
- Compiler warnings (was: transition to automake'fied GNU Mach), Thomas Schwinge, 2006/10/27
- Re: Compiler warnings (was: transition to automake'fied GNU Mach), Samuel Thibault, 2006/10/27