[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Gnumach warnings clean-up round 1
|
From: |
Thomas Schwinge |
|
Subject: |
Re: Gnumach warnings clean-up round 1 |
|
Date: |
Sun, 29 Oct 2006 01:20:48 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i |
Hello!
On Sat, Oct 28, 2006 at 10:04:23PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Does GNU mach's printf support %p?
It didn't use to, but...
#v+
2006-06-09 Stefan Siegl <stesie@brokenpipe.de>
[...]
* kern/printf.c (_doprnt): Support printing of pointer addresses.
#v-
Barry: I can have a look at your patches when I'm back from the one-week
trip with our local music association's youth. In the mean time: a good
way for testifying that you didn't break anything would be to compare the
compiled object files (however don't let changed file paths of the
debugging information in the object files confuse you) of a pristine and
a modified source base. If Samuel agrees that your patches are fine and
also nobody else vetoes, then he shall be free to check them in, with
appropriate ChangeLog entries.
Regards,
Thomas
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature