Re: Gnumach clean-up Round 2

[Barry deFreese]

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Thomas Bushnell BSG" <tb@becket.net>
To: <bug-hurd@gnu.org>
Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2006 12:42 PM
Subject: Re: Gnumach clean-up Round 2


> On Tue, 2006-11-07 at 12:18 -0500, Barry deFreese wrote:
> > Here is a patch for another round of cleanup.  This gets rid of warnings 
> > for
> > strcmp, strlen, and printf.
>
> I don't think we should have a file called <stdio.h> unless it's going
> to support all of stdio.  <printf.h> is a much better name for a header
> that includes only that.
>
> I don't see mention of deleting the superfluous files in <kern/...>; why
> not?
>
> Thomas

Thomas,

Thanks for the reply.  My intent would be to have a full stdio at some 
point.  Is that the wrong approach?

I didn't delete any files, what would I have deleted?  Strings.h?

Thanks again,

Barry