[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Gnumach: spl.h vs machspl.h
|
From: |
Thomas Bushnell BSG |
|
Subject: |
Re: Gnumach: spl.h vs machspl.h |
|
Date: |
Fri, 10 Nov 2006 10:56:35 -0800 |
On Fri, 2006-11-10 at 13:39 -0500, Barry deFreese wrote:
> Hi again folks,
>
> OK, I am confused by something else. (I know big surprise :-) ).
>
> i386/i386/spl.h
> #include ipl.h
>
> i386/i386/ipl.h
> #ifdef __ASSEMBLER__
> #include <i386/machspl.h>
> ...
>
> i386/i386/machspl.h
> /* XXX replaced by... */
> #include <i386/spl.h>
>
> First question is, is this an issue? machspl.h doesn't seem to have any
> #ifdef _I386_MACHSPL_H_ wrapper around it.
>
> Second question, is: Should machspl.h just be dropped and replace all
> instances with spl.h?
Perhaps the reason for having the different files is to accommodate
device drivers that were written for different kernels?
Thomas
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part