bug-hurd
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Gnumach cleanup Round 6


From: Barry deFreese
Subject: Re: Gnumach cleanup Round 6
Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2006 15:55:52 -0500
User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (Windows/20061025)

Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
On Wed, 2006-11-15 at 13:43 -0500, Barry deFreese wrote:
Hi folks, it's your favorite PITA again.. :-)

Index: i386/i386/trap.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/hurd/gnumach/i386/i386/trap.c,v
retrieving revision 1.5.2.6
diff -u -p -r1.5.2.6 trap.c
--- i386/i386/trap.c    11 Nov 2006 00:54:05 -0000      1.5.2.6
+++ i386/i386/trap.c    15 Nov 2006 17:15:58 -0000
@@ -60,6 +60,8 @@ extern void thread_exception_return();
 extern void i386_exception();
#if MACH_KDB
+#include <ddb/db_watch.h>
+#include <ddb/db_run.h>
 boolean_t      debug_all_traps_with_kdb = FALSE;
 extern struct db_watchpoint *db_watchpoint_list;
 extern boolean_t db_watchpoints_inserted;


The #includes should go at the front, with the rest of the <> includes.
Preserve the normal order:

#include <>
...
#include ""
...
other decls
...
functions

except when there is a good reason to deviate, which there does not seem
to be in this case.

Thomas

Thomas,

Thanks for the reply. Are you saying I should wrap those includes around an #ifdef MACH_KDB up where the other includes are? If so, that makes sense to me.

Thanks,

Barry




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]