[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Building glibc from CVS
|
From: |
Thomas Schwinge |
|
Subject: |
Re: Building glibc from CVS |
|
Date: |
Sun, 3 Dec 2006 15:23:51 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.9i |
Hello!
On Sun, Dec 03, 2006 at 12:05:03AM -0500, Barry deFreese wrote:
> ../sysdeps/generic/rtld-lowlevel.h:1:2: error: #error "Lowlevel
> primitives for ld.so not implemented"
This is already reported at
<http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3560>.
> Should we have an rtld-lowlevel.h (I don't see one on any other archs),
> or should we be implementing a sysdep dependent ldsodefs.h instead of
> using generic/?
The only `rtld-lowlevel.h' implementation I'm aware of is the
`nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/rtld-lowlevel.h' one. So, yes, we need a
non-nptl implementation. Whether this can then be generically usable or
will rather be system-dependent and living inside `sysdeps/' has to be
evaluated.
Regards,
Thomas
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature