[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: notify_no_senders oddity
|
From: |
Thomas Bushnell BSG |
|
Subject: |
Re: notify_no_senders oddity |
|
Date: |
Sun, 31 Dec 2006 13:06:55 -0800 |
On Sun, 2006-12-31 at 12:30 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Hi,
>
> There's something I don't understand in
> i386/i386at/i386at_ds_routines.c:ds_notify()
>
> dev = (device_t) ns->not_header.msgh_remote_port;
>
> How a port can be a device_t?
A device_t is just a mach_port_t that is expected to be talking to
something that implements the Mach device protocol.
Thomas
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part