[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Having generated files in cvs?
|
From: |
Richard Braun |
|
Subject: |
Re: Having generated files in cvs? |
|
Date: |
Thu, 4 Jan 2007 01:19:07 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.9i |
On Wed, Jan 03, 2007 at 12:55:21PM +0100, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> I don't have a general objection against changing that practice.
>
> What are others's opinions?
I had similar problems when working on the sound system (which is, by
the way, suspended due to bugs I'm unable to solve currently). I don't
think requiring people installing those tools is a problem, but it's
quite disturbing when checking diff's for developers, so my opinion
is that removing those generated files from the repository and having
people use autotools is a good thing.
--
Richard Braun
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
- [task #5468] Port GNU Mach to the Xen VMM, Samuel Thibault, 2007/01/01
- Re: [task #5468] Port GNU Mach to the Xen VMM, Thomas Schwinge, 2007/01/02
- Re: [task #5468] Port GNU Mach to the Xen VMM, Samuel Thibault, 2007/01/02
- Having generated files in cvs?, Thomas Schwinge, 2007/01/03
- Re: Having generated files in cvs?,
Richard Braun <=
- Re: Having generated files in cvs?, olafBuddenhagen, 2007/01/04
- Re: Having generated files in cvs?, Samuel Thibault, 2007/01/08
- Re: Having generated files in cvs?, Thomas Schwinge, 2007/01/08
- Re: Having generated files in cvs?, Roland McGrath, 2007/01/08
- Re: Having generated files in cvs?, Samuel Thibault, 2007/01/08
- Re: Having generated files in cvs?, Thomas Schwinge, 2007/01/10
- Re: Having generated files in cvs?, Samuel Thibault, 2007/01/10
- Re: Having generated files in cvs?, Leonardo Lopes Pereira, 2007/01/10
- Xen vs. GRUB, Thomas Schwinge, 2007/01/03
- Re: Xen vs. GRUB, Samuel Thibault, 2007/01/08