[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Having generated files in cvs?
|
From: |
Samuel Thibault |
|
Subject: |
Re: Having generated files in cvs? |
|
Date: |
Mon, 8 Jan 2007 19:07:10 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.12-2006-07-14 |
Thomas Schwinge, le Wed 03 Jan 2007 12:55:21 +0100, a écrit :
> An advantage is that we can easily tell people: ``Get the
> `gnumach-1-branch' from cvs and compile that one.'' without having to
> worry if they have suitable versions of the Auto* tools installed.
Projects usually have an autogen.sh script that verbosely complains if
they are missing.
Samuel
- [task #5468] Port GNU Mach to the Xen VMM, Samuel Thibault, 2007/01/01
- Re: [task #5468] Port GNU Mach to the Xen VMM, Thomas Schwinge, 2007/01/02
- Re: [task #5468] Port GNU Mach to the Xen VMM, Samuel Thibault, 2007/01/02
- Having generated files in cvs?, Thomas Schwinge, 2007/01/03
- Re: Having generated files in cvs?, Richard Braun, 2007/01/03
- Re: Having generated files in cvs?, olafBuddenhagen, 2007/01/04
- Re: Having generated files in cvs?,
Samuel Thibault <=
- Re: Having generated files in cvs?, Thomas Schwinge, 2007/01/08
- Re: Having generated files in cvs?, Roland McGrath, 2007/01/08
- Re: Having generated files in cvs?, Samuel Thibault, 2007/01/08
- Re: Having generated files in cvs?, Thomas Schwinge, 2007/01/10
- Re: Having generated files in cvs?, Samuel Thibault, 2007/01/10
- Re: Having generated files in cvs?, Leonardo Lopes Pereira, 2007/01/10
- Xen vs. GRUB, Thomas Schwinge, 2007/01/03
- Re: Xen vs. GRUB, Samuel Thibault, 2007/01/08
- Re: Xen vs. GRUB, Ian C. Blenke, 2007/01/08
- Re: Xen vs. GRUB, Samuel Thibault, 2007/01/08