bug-hurd
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[bug #18883] nice/getpriority/setpriority enforces even nice values


From: Samuel Thibault
Subject: [bug #18883] nice/getpriority/setpriority enforces even nice values
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 23:22:20 +0000
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.0.9) Gecko/20061219 Iceape/1.0.7 (Debian-1.0.7-2)

URL:
  <http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?18883>

                 Summary: nice/getpriority/setpriority enforces even nice
values
                 Project: The GNU Hurd
            Submitted by: sthibaul
            Submitted on: vendredi 26.01.2007 à 00:22
                Category: glibc
                Severity: 3 - Normal
                Priority: 5 - Normal
              Item Group: Standard Compliance
                  Status: None
                 Privacy: Public
             Assigned to: None
         Originator Name: 
        Originator Email: 
             Open/Closed: Open
         Discussion Lock: Any
         Reproducibility: Every Time
              Size (loc): None
         Planned Release: None
                  Effort: 0.00
Wiki-like text discussion box: 

    _______________________________________________________

Details:

Because of limitation of the Mach kernel, nice values are divided by two for
getting a Mach priority (MACH_PRIORITY_TO_NICE), and mach priority is
multiplied by two for getting a nice value (NICE_TO_MACH_PRIORITY).

That makes setpriority/getpriority/nice behave strangely: they enforce an
even nice value, which makes the corutils package's testsuite fail.

The POSIX standard says ``The nice() function shall add the value of incr to
the nice value of the calling process.'' and ``Upon successful completion,
nice() shall return the new nice value - {NZERO}.''

Does glibc need corrected or the testsuite fixed to accept such a behavior? 
I'd say glibc should be corrected, keeping the nice value in a global
variable.




    _______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

  <http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?18883>

_______________________________________________
  Message posté via/par Savannah
  http://savannah.gnu.org/





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]