[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Google Summer of Code project: libchannel
From: |
Carl Fredrik Hammar |
Subject: |
Re: Google Summer of Code project: libchannel |
Date: |
Wed, 21 Mar 2007 18:06:38 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.95 (gnu/linux) |
Thomas Schwinge <tschwinge@gnu.org> writes:
> Hello!
>
> On Tue, Mar 20, 2007 at 09:22:12PM +0100, Fredrik Hammar wrote:
>> first up let me introduce myself [...]
>
> Welcome, Fredrik!
>
Thanks!
>> get it running on Xen.
>
> That basically works, but still has a number of sharp edges and slippery
> slopes. But for sure we should document how to get it running at all...
Yeah I gave it a shot in the dark and gave up pretty quickly when it
didn't boot mach, I don't even know if I should change the default
domain builder to something else, let alone how to get Hurd started
after that.
But this isn't an issue I want to tackle at the moment, so lets leave
it at that.
>> Then I proceeded investigating the proposed projects and libchannel
>> is the one that interests me the most. However it might be a bit
>> more than I can chew...
>
> Nothing is carved in stone: the published tasks are the basis for the
> applicants to build their applications on. And nobody will stop you from
> contributing further once the GSoC is over. ;-)
That's a relief I guess, but I wouldn't want to apply for writing half
of libchannel and leave a promise to write the rest later ;-).
>> The main problem is my lack of experience with the Hurd's internals
>> and OSes in general. But since my studies right now are quite
>> relaxed, I feel I should be able to catch up by the time GsoC starts.
>> I could easily spend 10h a week studying the Hurd and `bonding' with
>> you guys (as Google puts it), and will spend more time than that as
>> needed if it's available. As a plus studying libstore during this
>> time, which should help me immensely with the design of libchannel,
>> will give me an opportunity to go through and fix some of libstore's
>> documentation.
>
>> So I want a second opinion; should I go for it and write a proposal
>> for a libchannel implementation or should I consider some other
>> project instead?
>
> If you can spend the time on it right now -- applications are open until
> the end of this weekend, I think -- writing and submitting your
> application would indeed be a worthwhile thing to do. I can -- of course
> -- give absolutely no guarantees that we might select yours, but you'll
> hopefull already learn a lot when writing that application.
Well of course, I wasn't expecting any guarantees of my proposal
getting picked. On the contrary, I was hoping I didn't get a
guarantees that I wouldn't be picked. ;-)
But since that doesn't seem to be the case, I'll guess I give it my
best shot at writing a proper proposal. Now I can concentrate on
actually writing the proposal and not look around for alternatives, at
least not until I get this proposal done.
>> PS. I'm new to posting on mailing lists, please excuse and correct any
>> misstakes I make.
>
> Nothing to find fault within so far. :-)
>
>
> Regards,
> Thomas
Lets hope it stays that way. :-)
Thanks again,
Fredrik