Re: GPLv3 and Hurd? (also a possible license violation)

[Thomas Bushnell BSG]

On Sat, 2007-06-16 at 14:52 -0400, Michael Casadevall wrote:
> I had emailed Thomas in regards to this because I didn't want to start
> a general panic over the license. Anyway, we have a few problems in
> any regard (I'm a Savannah Administrator, and if we have to remove the
> GPL later clause, then we're in violation of Savannah's hosting
> policy)

Once more, I seem to have taken your word for it when I shouldn't have.

The link you provided, to
https://savannah.gnu.org/maintenance/GnuGplTwoOrLater, certainly does
request people to use the "or any later version" clause.  Well and good.

Nothing there, however, says that projects *must* use it as a condition
of being hosted on Savannah.

I do hope you are not using your position to attempt to strongarm people
into following rules that do not actually exist.

Thomas

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part