[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Defualt socket server overriding
From: |
Neal H. Walfield |
Subject: |
Re: Defualt socket server overriding |
Date: |
Wed, 20 Jun 2007 18:20:12 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Wanderlust/2.14.0 (Africa) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.6 (Marutamachi) APEL/10.6 Emacs/21.4 (i386-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) |
At Thu, 21 Jun 2007 00:09:45 +0800,
Wei Shen wrote:
> I still think there are ways to solve this problem. For example, the fs
> server can add an virtual root argument to the passive translator, and the
> translator (which we trust) will later add this virtual root to any path
> argument provided by the chroot process.
How does it know the process is chroot'ed?
- Re: Defualt socket server overriding, (continued)
- Re: Defualt socket server overriding, Wei Shen, 2007/06/19
- Re: Defualt socket server overriding, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2007/06/19
- Re: Defualt socket server overriding, Wei Shen, 2007/06/20
- Re: Defualt socket server overriding, olafBuddenhagen, 2007/06/20
- Re: Defualt socket server overriding, Neal H. Walfield, 2007/06/20
- Re: Defualt socket server overriding, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2007/06/20
- Re: Defualt socket server overriding, Neal H. Walfield, 2007/06/20
Re: Defualt socket server overriding, Wei Shen, 2007/06/20
- Re: Defualt socket server overriding, Neal H. Walfield, 2007/06/20
- Re: Defualt socket server overriding, Wei Shen, 2007/06/20
- Re: Defualt socket server overriding,
Neal H. Walfield <=
- Re: Defualt socket server overriding, Wei Shen, 2007/06/20
- passive translators, Neal H. Walfield, 2007/06/20
- Re: passive translators, Wei Shen, 2007/06/21
- Re: passive translators, Neal H. Walfield, 2007/06/21
- Re: passive translators, Wei Shen, 2007/06/21
- Re: passive translators, Neal H. Walfield, 2007/06/21
- Re: passive translators, Wei Shen, 2007/06/21
- Re: passive translators, Wei Shen, 2007/06/21