[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Requesting for review of the Draft proposal for - procfs
From: |
olafBuddenhagen |
Subject: |
Re: Requesting for review of the Draft proposal for - procfs |
Date: |
Fri, 4 Apr 2008 09:11:07 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.17+20080114 (2008-01-14) |
Hi,
Sorry for the late reply...
On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 01:07:15AM +0530, Madhusudan C.S wrote:
> I have submitted a totally reworked proposal through Google Web App.
> [...]
> The project thus aims at making the GNU/Linux process management tools
> like ps, top, vmstat, sysctl, w, kill, skill, nice, snice, pgrep,
> free, tload, uptime, fuser, killall, pidof, pstree, etc., to run out
> of the box.
Not all of these listed ar actually relevant -- see the other discussion
on that topic...
> To begin with, I would be migrating existing procfs code which uses
> libtrivfs, to use libnetfs throughout procfs.
BTW, this is not really relavant to your application, but I guess I can
mention it nevertheless: Instead of first moving the existing translator
to libnetfs, and then working on the individual functionalities, it
might be a better idea to start with a libnetfs-based skeleton only
first, and move over individual functionalities one by one as you are
working on them... But that's just an idea to consider; I'm not even
sure it's really the best approach :-)
The remaining stuff I think we already have discussed in the other
thread :-)
-antrik-
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- Re: Requesting for review of the Draft proposal for - procfs,
olafBuddenhagen <=