[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: GSoC: procfs implementation.

From: olafBuddenhagen
Subject: Re: GSoC: procfs implementation.
Date: Fri, 9 May 2008 20:48:11 +0200
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.17+20080114 (2008-01-14)


On Fri, May 09, 2008 at 12:35:44AM +0530, Madhusudan C.S wrote:

> The existing procfs code uses libtrivfs. So one of the goal's of my
> GSoC project is to rewrite procfs so that uses libnetfs.  During the
> proposal submission stage, I had said that I will first port every
> feature in the existing code to use libnetfs and then start
> implementing the new features. Olaf suggested that its a better idea
> to write the libnetfs skeleton first and then port the existing
> individual features as and when it is required. But he asked me to
> make sure which is a better way once. I request to you all to suggest
> me which method suits this case.

Well, in the end it is your decision...

Would be nice though if you could explain why you think one way is
better than the other :-) What possible advantages and disadvantages do
you see in for each variant?


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]