[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Hurd] error_t, E*, and c++

From: Samuel Thibault
Subject: Re: [Hurd] error_t, E*, and c++
Date: Tue, 27 May 2008 11:01:29 +0100
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.12-2006-07-14

Roland McGrath, le Mon 26 May 2008 20:01:17 -0700, a écrit :
> But I think we might just have to live with
> C++ using (error_t) EFOO,

A friend of mine suggested to rather use error_t(EFOO), which is a bit
less dirty but still works.

> or else supply a C++ <errno> or whatever where there is explicitly
> no expectation of int-valued or cpp-usable values, if people would
> actually use that.

That would be less easy to get accepted I guess.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]