[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Revision control
From: |
Arne Babenhauserheide |
Subject: |
Re: Revision control |
Date: |
Wed, 28 May 2008 22:34:41 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.9.9 |
I like the idea.
It would lower the barrier to begin coding on the hurd (I think), and it would
be a good opportunity to clean up the cvs chaos a bit (so newcomers don't get
completely lost in the different repositories).
Also it has the advantage to remove the central point of failure, which feels
very Hurd-like to me: Everyone has a full copy of the repository, and only
the reference repository is under central control.
But I don't code, so I don't think it's my place to decide, and the wiki
already uses git anyway (even though I prefer Mercurial myself, since it
feels more natural to me and doesn't have to be cleaned up regularly - and it
works in my Hurd installation :) ).
Best wishes,
Arne
Am Dienstag 27 Mai 2008 23:30:32 schrieb Andrei Barbu:
> Hi,
>
> Would there be support for moving to a different revision control
> mechanism? Anything is far better than cvs, especially if it's distributed.
> I saw there was some talk of this a while ago but nothing happened. We've
> got lots of good options to pick from that we know will scale well.
>
>
> Andrei
--
Unpolitisch sein
Heißt politisch sein
Ohne es zu merken.
- Arne Babenhauserheide ( http://draketo.de )
-- Weblog: http://blog.draketo.de
-- Infinite Hands: http://infinite-hands.draketo.de - singing a part of the
history of free software.
-- Ein Würfel System: http://1w6.org - einfach sauberere (Rollenspiel-) Regeln
-- Mein öffentlicher Schlüssel (PGP/GnuPG):
http://draketo.de/inhalt/ich/pubkey.txt
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
- Revision control, Andrei Barbu, 2008/05/27
- Re: Revision control,
Arne Babenhauserheide <=
Re: Revision control, Ivan Shmakov, 2008/05/30