[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: dir_lookup, locking and EINTR
From: |
Thomas Bushnell BSG |
Subject: |
Re: dir_lookup, locking and EINTR |
Date: |
Wed, 20 Aug 2008 18:56:44 -0700 |
On Thu, 2008-08-21 at 00:39 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> That's safer indeed. To make things simpler, the patch below just
> systematically resets NEWPI and NEWPO to NULL as soon as they don't need
> to be dereferenced, does it look ok?
It does, but "NULL" is entirely unnecessary. I much prefer setting
pointer variables to "0", which is the way the vast majority of the Hurd
code is written. :)
Thomas