[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: filter naming

From: Sergiu Ivanov
Subject: Re: filter naming
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 11:18:34 +0200
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)


On Sat, Nov 07, 2009 at 12:13:30AM +0100, olafBuddenhagen@gmx.net wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 04, 2009 at 05:15:30PM +0200, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> > Also, IIRC, the filter is expected to be run via symbolic links and
> > extract the name of the translator to be filtered out from its command
> > line arguments (I mean argv[0]);
> BTW, I concluded by now that it's probably nicer not to hard-code that
> functionality in the filter itself, but rather use a simple wrapper that
> does this...

Hm, I guess this is something we yet have to discuss.  It would be
great if we did this at the coming meeting.
> > in this case the real name of the filter is not extremely important,
> > since the final user will rarely use that name.
> Indeed.
> Still would be good to have something expressive :-)

I have nothing against expressive names :-) Do you already have
something on your mind?


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]