[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Mercurial vs. git

From: olafBuddenhagen
Subject: Re: Mercurial vs. git
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 15:11:26 +0100
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05)


On Mon, Nov 09, 2009 at 10:47:26AM +0100, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, 5. November 2009 13:56:09 schrieb
> olafBuddenhagen@gmx.net:

> > My opinion is that there is no "one size fits all" here.
> My opinion is that there's quite a neat sweet spot between the two
> extremes - 

I don't believe this. There is a good reason why for most tasks, there
are both "simple" programs for casual users and complex programs for
"professionals". I don't see why revision control would be different.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]