[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Mercurial vs. git

From: Michal Suchanek
Subject: Re: Mercurial vs. git
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 11:49:02 +0100

2009/11/10  <olafBuddenhagen@gmx.net>:
> Hi,
> On Mon, Nov 09, 2009 at 10:47:26AM +0100, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
>> Am Donnerstag, 5. November 2009 13:56:09 schrieb
>> olafBuddenhagen@gmx.net:
>> > My opinion is that there is no "one size fits all" here.
>> My opinion is that there's quite a neat sweet spot between the two
>> extremes -
> I don't believe this. There is a good reason why for most tasks, there
> are both "simple" programs for casual users and complex programs for
> "professionals". I don't see why revision control would be different.

Well, there are programs that are adaptable and programs that are not.

If you took a professional photo editor and wanted to make a simple
photo editor you would have to rework the whole gui.

However, if you take git and add some scripts that hide some of git
features you can offer a simpler interface to the same powerful



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]