[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: GNU/Hurd in german news

From: Arne Babenhauserheide
Subject: Re: GNU/Hurd in german news
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 15:35:53 +0100
User-agent: KMail/1.12.3 (Linux/2.6.30-gentoo-r5; KDE/4.3.3; x86_64; ; )


Am Donnerstag, 12. November 2009 14:45:00 schrieb Thomas Schwinge:
> On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 01:18:17PM +0100, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
> > Am Donnerstag, 12. November 2009 12:57:22 schrieb Arne Babenhauserheide:
> > > -> http://www.bddebian.com/~hurd-web/hurd/status/
> >
> > @Thomas: Can you write a note, once you pulled this into hurd.gnu.org?
> Done.

Many thanks! 
The comment is in: http://www.osnews.com/permalink?394278
> FVWM, and I also added Gnumeric to this description.

Corrected :) 

> Actually the page *does* mention is, but see
> <http://ikiwiki.info/bugs/img_vs_align/>.  Who has the CSS foo?  Anatoly?

I see you already fiex it on bddebian - looks good, many thanks! 

> Strictly speaking, you don't need a real (hardware) X server running to
> take such a picture, as there are also virtual (correct term?) X servers.

You could also have a console ssh'ed to a Hurd box in your GNU/Linux X-Server 
- of even just fake the console :) 

But if people start with that, we can stop discussing, since nothing will make 
them happy (but everything will take our time :) ). 

> > @Samuel: Do you have contact with the fvwm people? If yes: Could you send
> > them a link with the status page?
> I'd suggest to only do this if they have a page where they list
> screenshots of FVWM in action.  Otherwise this would be false news; false
> in the sense of not being new.

That's a good point... 

Am Donnerstag, 12. November 2009 14:45:12 schrieb Samuel Thibault:
> I'd rather say: why telling fvwm people and not twm people, owm people,
> foowm people, etc?  Just because I happen to use fvwm for my desktop? :)

They got lucky ;-) 

Best wishes, 

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]