[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: unionmount branches

From: Sergiu Ivanov
Subject: Re: unionmount branches
Date: Sat, 12 Dec 2009 06:07:29 +0200
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)


On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 07:21:01AM +0100, olafBuddenhagen@gmx.net wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 07:20:08PM +0200, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> > antrik suggested that I put only the patch series to which he has
> > given a final acknowledge into the public repository.
> Not exactly: I suggested that you only put the acknowledged patches on
> the *main* unionmount branch. There is nothing wrong with keeping the
> others in topic branches.

Aha, I see; I think I can remember now that you have indeed exposed
this opinion.
> (Though I'm still not convinced that having all the topic branches in
> the main repo is really better than some personal development repo...
> But I don't really care much either way.)

I'd say I don't feel enthusiastic about pushing topic development
branches into the main repository without an explicit need either.  Of
course, I could easily do that if that would be necessary, but since I
don't see any real motivation now, I'd rather refrain from that.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]