bug-hurd
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: hurd/trans/hello.c changes


From: Sergiu Ivanov
Subject: Re: hurd/trans/hello.c changes
Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 09:59:08 +0200
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)

Hello,

On Thu, Dec 24, 2009 at 12:32:53PM +0530, Shakthi Kannan wrote:
> --- On Thu, Dec 24, 2009 at 12:42 AM, Sergiu Ivanov
> | Printing to a file is nothing fancy: the fprintf functions should
> | suffice.
> \--
> 
> I would appreciate if I could see a working example. When I use
> fprintf(stdout, "message"); or fprintf(stderr, "error"); in a
> translator, and use it with:
> 
>   settrans -fgap /tmp/hello hello 1>out 2>err
> 
> neither of them are going into out or err, or the console. Probably, I
> am missing something here.

Translators do not normally have standard input or standard output.  I
think you could explicitly assign some files to stdin or stdout, but
initially these point to nothing (AIUI), so you have to explicitly
open a file before fprintf-ing to it.  As for stderr, I cannot tell
why it won't work, since I've never tried this and, unfourtunately, I
have too little time to check it now :-( (One could attach gdb to the
translator and inspect stderr, for instance.)

Also, I think using absolute paths for opening files for debug output
is better than relative paths, but I don't remember the exact
reasoning.  A candidate would be that passive translators do not
always get the working directory you would expect, but I'm not sure
whether this is applicable in you case.

Regards,
Sergiu




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]