Re: Reauthentication implementation flaw due to EINTR

[Samuel Thibault]

Carl Fredrik Hammar, le Tue 29 Dec 2009 23:40:21 +0100, a écrit :
> On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 11:10:00PM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > 
> > That's the same.  To make it clearer, see attached patch.
> 
> I meant in the other branch of the if (though for some reason I didn't
> consider the server part's if).

Err, what for?  In that case, dead name notification isn't
requested, is it?  Or is it always requested by default and
ports_interrupt_self_on_port_death() is just to change the behavior?
(I'm a complete newbie for such parts of the Hurd...)

Samuel