[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: review of modifications of eth-multiplexer

From: Sergiu Ivanov
Subject: Re: review of modifications of eth-multiplexer
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2009 15:32:12 +0200
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)


On Sat, Dec 26, 2009 at 06:14:10PM +0100, olafBuddenhagen@gmx.net wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 06:32:41PM +0200, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 03:51:16PM +0100, olafBuddenhagen@gmx.net
> > wrote:
> > > These are probably all related. It's all part of the network
> > > virtualization project.
> > 
> > I see.  The question, then, is whether it is appropriate to push the
> > whole Hurd source tree with Zheng's changes to the incubator, or would
> > it be better to have a separate repository for that?
> I don't see why it should go into the incubator at all. Just put it on a
> branch in the main repository -- like it was in CVS.

Taking into consideration the fact that I have Zheng's project as a
modified Hurd repository, the idea would be to create a new branch in
hurd.git and migrate the git repository I have to that new branch.

There's still a question unanswered in my mind: when Thomas gave me
the Hurd repository with Zheng's changes, he told that he intended to
do something with this repository, but I don't remember what
exactly.  May it be true that Thomas has already pushed this
repository somewhere?


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]