Re: Many questions about translators

[olafBuddenhagen]

Hi,

On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 03:35:49PM +0200, Carl Fredrik Hammar wrote:

> Again, it seems like a natural split to me.  One translator per
> filesystem: one to merge the different packages into a single
> filesystem, and the other to interact with it.

I really don't see any point in introducing an arbitrary process boundry
here. It's not like you are actually splitting off any meaningful
functionality -- the extra node would just be a proxy. The extra
handling to set up that node would only add hassle to the user -- on top
of a lot of additional hassle for the implementation.

Better just handle it in the main process directly.

-antrik-