Re: Usable translators: nsmux details

[Sergiu Ivanov]

On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 10:31:26AM +0200, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
> On Tuesday 13 July 2010 09:48:13 Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> > Aha, good to hear.  This means that, unless nsmux opens bogus ports
> > (which I don't remember), the anonymous translators will actually go
> > away after the timeout with the current design.
> 
> And that means: nothing missing, nsmux works as it should? 

Apparently, nsmux is capable of performing a basic subset of
functionality it was designed to be capable of doing.  I can remember
myself trying a number (not a considerable one, though) of tests that
proved that nsmux starts translators nicely, but I never tried to see
whether anonymous translators went away on their own.

You'd better wait until antrik has his final answer to this question,
as I am somewhat afraid to respond in a binary way... :-)

Best regards,
Sergiu