[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: hurdextras in git?

From: Thomas Schwinge
Subject: Re: hurdextras in git?
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2010 10:56:53 +0200
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)


On Sat, Jul 24, 2010 at 04:19:46AM +0200, olafBuddenhagen@gmx.net wrote:
> > > > > They have some very interesting translators, and these should be
> > > > > easily available.

> You mean Git submodules? Yeah, that's an option worth considering. I'm a
> little undecided on submodules vs. monolithic repo. (I definitely
> dislike the idea of completely independant repos.)

OK -- we do agree on that submodule one.  (Isn't it nice?)  ;-)

My idea has always been to have such stuff in separate submodules, and
then have a overlying project (the top-level hurd.git one) that contains
a bunch of submodules (various translators; everything that's
intersting), can serve as sort of a tested distribution (because the
submodules are versioned), plus adding build machinery /
cross-compilation support, etc.  Just added:


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]