[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Shouldn't we use partition type 63 (GNU HURD)?

From: Thomas Schwinge
Subject: Re: Shouldn't we use partition type 63 (GNU HURD)?
Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2010 05:45:59 +0200
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)


On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 11:39:13PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> IIRC, the currently recommended way is to use partition type 83 (Linux)
> just because the old debian installer only recognizes those.  Is there
> any other reason which prevents us from using type 63 in the Debian
> installer?

<http://www.google.com/search?q=gnu+hurd+0x63>, first hit:


(Could do with some proper integration / reformatting, though.)


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]