[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Shouldn't we use partition type 63 (GNU HURD)?
|
From: |
Thomas Schwinge |
|
Subject: |
Re: Shouldn't we use partition type 63 (GNU HURD)? |
|
Date: |
Wed, 18 Aug 2010 05:45:59 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) |
Hello!
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 11:39:13PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> IIRC, the currently recommended way is to use partition type 83 (Linux)
> just because the old debian installer only recognizes those. Is there
> any other reason which prevents us from using type 63 in the Debian
> installer?
<http://www.google.com/search?q=gnu+hurd+0x63>, first hit:
<http://www.gnu.org/software/hurd/hurd/faq.html>.
:-)
(Could do with some proper integration / reformatting, though.)
Regards,
Thomas
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature