[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Fwd: live cd
From: |
Oz |
Subject: |
Fwd: live cd |
Date: |
Fri, 25 Feb 2011 16:24:28 -0600 |
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Oz <gnulogic@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 4:24 PM
Subject: Re: live cd
To: Michael Walker <mike@barrucadu.co.uk>
i am happy with unstable and slow, if its not to hard to install. :)
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 3:58 PM, Michael Walker <mike@barrucadu.co.uk> wrote:
> On 25 February 2011 21:44, Oz <gnulogic@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Debian Gnu/Hurd seems to be complicated to install from what i
>> understand because 1 its not a live cd or install cd. 2-you need qemu
>> virtulization. I want to run it natevly as the sole operating system
>> on one netbook i have. i dont know or understand much i am a ubuntu
>> gnu/linux user and have been using gnu/linux for a couple of years and
>> am truly a noob compared to you guys but want to use a fully free
>> system and support the gnu project. but i need the easiesest route
>> possible :) thats why i was think about the arch hurd live cd.
>>
>
> If you're going to use the graphical one, be warned that that's pretty
> much just a proof-of-concept. It's a pet project one of the devs is
> working on and is pretty slow/unstable. Also, the official
> installation CD is pretty unstable, too.
>
> --
> Michael Walker (http://www.barrucadu.co.uk)
>
> Arch Hurd Developer; GNU Webmaster; FSF member #8385
> http://www.archhurd.org http://www.gnu.org http://www.fsf.org
>
- live cd, Oz, 2011/02/24
- Re: live cd, Svante Signell, 2011/02/24
- Re: live cd, Samuel Thibault, 2011/02/25
- Re: live cd, Oz, 2011/02/25
- Re: live cd, Samuel Thibault, 2011/02/25
- Re: live cd, Oz, 2011/02/25
- Re: live cd, Samuel Thibault, 2011/02/25