Re: [Fwd: Questions on isc-dhcp]

[Svante Signell]

Looks like the ldap attachment was too big for the list.
I'm replacing the complete ldap patch with the patch in bug #602312.

On Wed, 2011-03-02 at 09:17 +0100, Svante Signell wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-03-02 at 02:28 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > I forgot to comment on the udeb version: I don't think we want to create
> > an inetutils-tools udeb package, while we can simply issue settrans
> > which should be easy and fine enough, since we only handle one
> > interface, thus my changes.
> 
> Ok, I'm attaching the patch, fix_ftbfs4hurd.dpatch, with your updated
> dhclient-scripts. I think my name should be removed from the patched
> scripts, you did most of the changes.
> 
> Still missing are dependencies on inetutils-tools (inetutils-ifconfig)
> (and maybe inetutils-ping) for GNU/Hurd in the control file:
> 
> (if needed, it looks like the Linux package does not depend on
> net-tools, containing route and ifconfig or iputils-ping containing
> ping?)
> 
> Package: isc-dhcp-client
> Architecture: any
> Depends: debianutils (>= 2.8.2), isc-dhcp-common (= ${binary:Version}),
> 
> -iproute [linux-any], ${shlibs:Depends}, ${misc:Depends}
> (I'm not sure about the syntax here)
> +iproute [linux-any]| inetutils-tools [hurd] , ${shlibs:Depends}, 
> 
> ${misc:Depends}
> 
> In order to get a successful configure, the patch in bug #602312 by
> Colin Watson have to be applied to configure.ac to cope with the new
> behavior of the linker: --no-add-needed since gcc-4.4.5-11. I'm
> attaching an updated dhcp-4.1.0-ldap-code.dpatch
> 
> Also attached is the dpatch series file: 00list
> 
> I just built from source again, and it went well. Hoewever it is not yet
> installed again and tested with the updated dhclient-scripts. Comments
> on improvements are welcome.
> 
> Svante
>

fix_ftbfs4hurd.dpatch
Description: application/shellscript

bug602312.patch
Description: Text Data

00list
Description: Text document