[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: XMLFS for GSoC
From: |
Michael S. Walker |
Subject: |
Re: XMLFS for GSoC |
Date: |
Wed, 13 Apr 2011 20:01:37 +0100 |
> I briefly considered this, but I think we should rather go for the
> opposite: let the XSLT translator take files as input. If directory
> input is desired, it can always be set on top of unxml.
That is probably a better solution, if the xslt translator presents a
file as output, giving it a directory as input (when it doesn't
explicitly require it) does seem a bit silly.
> (BTW, the naming is rather confusing -- unxml actually turns the
> underlying structure *into* XML... Maybe we should use more explicit
> names instead: something like xml2dir and dir2xml perhaps.)
Better named would be good, "unxmlfs" is a bit confusing unless you
know what it is / is going to be.
> > However, XSLT is commonly used to turn one XML document into
> > another, so perhaps there should be an option to try and present it
> > as a directory tree,
>
> Again, it seems saner to put another xmlfs on top if this is required.
>
Yes, I agree now.
--
Michael Walker (http://www.barrucadu.co.uk)
Arch Hurd Developer; GNU Webmaster; FSF member #8385
http://www.archhurd.org http://www.gnu.org http://www.fsf.org
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- Re: XMLFS for GSoC, (continued)
- Re: XMLFS for GSoC, Samuel Thibault, 2011/04/02
- Re: XMLFS for GSoC, olafBuddenhagen, 2011/04/05
- Re: XMLFS for GSoC, olafBuddenhagen, 2011/04/07
- Re: XMLFS for GSoC, Michael Walker, 2011/04/07
- Re: XMLFS for GSoC, olafBuddenhagen, 2011/04/07
- Re: XMLFS for GSoC,
Michael S. Walker <=