[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: gnumach FTBFS
From: |
Thomas Schwinge |
Subject: |
Re: gnumach FTBFS |
Date: |
Wed, 18 May 2011 12:18:39 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Notmuch/0.5-77-g335dd52 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.2.1 (i486-pc-linux-gnu) |
Hallo!
On Wed, 18 May 2011 11:37:45 +0200, Svante Signell <svante.signell@telia.com>
wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-05-18 at 10:31 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > Samuel Thibault, le Wed 18 May 2011 10:28:50 +0200, a écrit :
> > > Svante Signell, le Sun 15 May 2011 11:11:41 +0200, a écrit :
> > > > On Sun, 2011-05-15 at 00:26 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > > > > > I run Hurd under qemu on a Debian GNU/Linux testing box. qemu-kvm
> > > > > > version 0.14.0+dfsg-1~tls
> > > > >
> > > > > Which precise version of gcc are you using?
> > > >
> > > > gcc --version
> > > > gcc-4.6.real (Debian 4.6.0-6) 4.6.1 20110428 (prerelease)
>
> Now I use:
> gcc-4.6.real (Debian 4.6.0-7) 4.6.1 20110507 (prerelease)
> same results as before.
Wait a moment... gcc-4.6.real. Is that still with the hardening-wrapper
package installed? -- OK... I should just continue reading your
email... :-)
> > With which CFLAGS does the build happen? Is it simply dpkg-buildpackage?
>
> dpkg-buildpackage -b
> CFLAGS seems to be: -Wall -g -pipe -fno-strict-aliasing -O2
> from debian/rules and: -nostdinc -imacros -fno-stack-protector
> from build/Makefile
>
> However the hardening wrapper is active around gcc-4.6. I don't think it
> is active though, it has to be activated in the debian/rules file.
Might still be some odditiy with the wrapper. Please un-install that one
(or force the GNU Mach build to use /usr/bin/gcc-4.6.real (by setting
CC?)), and try again. If that resolves the problem, we got another
candidate that needs debugging with respect to the hardening wrapper.
Grüße,
Thomas
pgp2SltvFXJEk.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- Re: Race condition in Mach/Hurd?, (continued)
- gnumach FTBFS: Was Re: Race condition in Mach/Hurd?, Svante Signell, 2011/05/12
- Re: gnumach FTBFS: Was Re: Race condition in Mach/Hurd?, Samuel Thibault, 2011/05/13
- Re: gnumach FTBFS: Was Re: Race condition in Mach/Hurd?, Svante Signell, 2011/05/14
- Re: gnumach FTBFS: Was Re: Race condition in Mach/Hurd?, Samuel Thibault, 2011/05/14
- Re: gnumach FTBFS: Was Re: Race condition in Mach/Hurd?, Svante Signell, 2011/05/15
- Re: gnumach FTBFS: Was Re: Race condition in Mach/Hurd?, Samuel Thibault, 2011/05/18
- Re: gnumach FTBFS: Was Re: Race condition in Mach/Hurd?, Samuel Thibault, 2011/05/18
- Re: gnumach FTBFS, Svante Signell, 2011/05/18
- Re: gnumach FTBFS,
Thomas Schwinge <=
- Re: gnumach FTBFS, Svante Signell, 2011/05/18
- Re: gnumach FTBFS, Svante Signell, 2011/05/18
- Re: gnumach FTBFS, Svante Signell, 2011/05/18
- Re: gnumach FTBFS, Samuel Thibault, 2011/05/18
- Re: gnumach FTBFS, Svante Signell, 2011/05/18
- Re: gnumach FTBFS, Samuel Thibault, 2011/05/18
- Re: gnumach FTBFS, Svante Signell, 2011/05/18
- Re: gnumach FTBFS, Samuel Thibault, 2011/05/18
- Re: gnumach FTBFS, Svante Signell, 2011/05/18
- Re: gnumach FTBFS, Svante Signell, 2011/05/18