[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH 15/15] Hurd signals: Use POSIX sigcodes
|
From: |
Jérémie Koenig |
|
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH 15/15] Hurd signals: Use POSIX sigcodes |
|
Date: |
Wed, 29 Jun 2011 23:17:49 +0000 |
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 10:59 PM, Samuel Thibault
<samuel.thibault@gnu.org> wrote:
> Jérémie Koenig, le Wed 29 Jun 2011 22:55:48 +0000, a écrit :
>> The old !SA_SIGINFO case was a non-standard (BSD-based?) extension. Is
>> there really anything using it?
>
> You can never know. And thus probably have to keep it.
Would mapping the old values to the new ones in the trampoline code be
an acceptable compromise?
Should I rename the constants so that programs using them would fail
to compile, and therefore be noticed and, hopefully, updated to the
more portable SA_SIGINFO interface?
Would it still be ok to introduce POSIX sigcodes where 0 was used before?
--
Jérémie Koenig <jk@jk.fr.eu.org>
http://jk.fr.eu.org/
- [PATCH 13/15] Hurd signals: Copy bits/sigaction.h, (continued)
- [PATCH 13/15] Hurd signals: Copy bits/sigaction.h, Jeremie Koenig, 2011/06/29
- [PATCH 07/15] Hurd signals: fix uninitialized value., Jeremie Koenig, 2011/06/29
- [PATCH 04/15] Hurd signals: refactor check_pending_signals, Jeremie Koenig, 2011/06/29
- [PATCH 03/15] _hurd_internal_post_signal: Split out inner functions, Jeremie Koenig, 2011/06/29
- [PATCH 09/15] Hurd signals: implement global signal dispositions, Jeremie Koenig, 2011/06/29
- [PATCH 12/15] Hurd signals: fix global untraced signals., Jeremie Koenig, 2011/06/29
- [PATCH 15/15] Hurd signals: Use POSIX sigcodes, Jeremie Koenig, 2011/06/29
Re: [PATCH 00/15] Hurd signals: please review, Jérémie Koenig, 2011/06/29