bug-hurd
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Implicit IN?


From: Samuel Thibault
Subject: Re: Implicit IN?
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 22:13:42 +0200
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21+34 (58baf7c9f32f) (2010-12-30)

olafBuddenhagen@gmx.net, le Tue 27 Sep 2011 03:03:31 +0200, a écrit :
> On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 05:34:53PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > olafBuddenhagen@gmx.net, le Fri 23 Sep 2011 03:26:21 +0200, a écrit :
> 
> > > Maybe I'm missing something, but I fail to see why integers or
> > > character arrays would by any more implicitly IN than other
> > > types?...
> > 
> > Because they can't be OUT.
> 
> Doesn't answer my question. Why can't they? In fact we have many such
> parameters in the Hurd and Mach .defs...

I was starting from the C function prototype actually, not the defs
prototype. In the former case a mere integer can't be OUT.

Samuel



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]