Re: [Fwd: Debugging execve problems]

[Svante Signell]

On Sat, 2012-01-07 at 20:40 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > > because the more you ask me things, the less I have time to
> > > spend on other things, such as the dhcp patch which I still haven't
> > > found any time to work on.
> > 
> > I could do that if you agree that we go back the the get_hw_address
> > patch I first submitted is a better way to resolve the upstream doubts
> > than your updated  version.
> 
> Problem is that if I proposed something else, it's most probably because
> I believed that it was better, and more acceptable for upstream.

I can do whatever you choose would be best accepted upstream, or you
submit an updated patch yourself. I think this issue should have been
solved a long time ago. This is ridiculous, how peoples honest (and
correct) contributions are just being ignored.... Well, the license is
BSD, right? However, forking would be extremely unfortunate (and
unrealistic).