[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 64bit GNU Mach
From: |
Richard Braun |
Subject: |
Re: 64bit GNU Mach |
Date: |
Mon, 2 Apr 2012 13:46:08 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) |
On Mon, Apr 02, 2012 at 12:35:25PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Richard Braun, le Mon 02 Apr 2012 12:03:34 +0200, a écrit :
> > Kernel port names are addresses of their target IPC port object.
>
> Inside the kernel, yes. In the userland processes, no. That's the
> difference that xnu makes between mach_port_t (kernelland) and
> mach_port_name_t (userland) (sorry I forgot to mention that in my
> previous mail).
[...]
> We can also rather simply fix the code that converts from names to
> pointers into using different sizes, like xnu does.
How do they convert names from/to pointers ? Regular IPC space lookups ?
--
Richard Braun
- 64bit GNU Mach, Samuel Thibault, 2012/04/01
- Re: 64bit GNU Mach, Richard Braun, 2012/04/02
- Re: 64bit GNU Mach, Samuel Thibault, 2012/04/02
- Re: 64bit GNU Mach,
Richard Braun <=
- Re: 64bit GNU Mach, Samuel Thibault, 2012/04/02
- Re: 64bit GNU Mach, Richard Braun, 2012/04/02
- Re: 64bit GNU Mach, Samuel Thibault, 2012/04/02
- Re: 64bit GNU Mach, Richard Braun, 2012/04/02
- Re: 64bit GNU Mach, Samuel Thibault, 2012/04/02
- Re: 64bit GNU Mach, Richard Braun, 2012/04/02
- Re: 64bit GNU Mach, Samuel Thibault, 2012/04/02
- Re: 64bit GNU Mach, Richard Braun, 2012/04/02
- Re: 64bit GNU Mach, Samuel Thibault, 2012/04/02
- Re: 64bit GNU Mach, Richard Braun, 2012/04/02