[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: iconx and execve problems
|
From: |
Svante Signell |
|
Subject: |
Re: iconx and execve problems |
|
Date: |
Tue, 05 Jun 2012 08:02:25 +0200 |
On Tue, 2012-06-05 at 04:28 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Svante Signell, le Thu 10 May 2012 11:30:52 +0200, a écrit :
> > the icon package FTBFS due to a missing . in PATH. Other architectures
> > does not have this problem. According to Samuel the problem is missing
> > info from glibc to the exec server about $0.
> >
> > In May-June 2010 Emilio Pozuelo monfort proposed a set of patches to
> > glibc and the exec server by adding two new RPCs
> > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-hurd/2010-05/msg00108.html
> > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-hurd/2010-06/msg00002.html
>
> Yes. It's also the reason for a bunch of testsuite failures, notably
> glib. I spent time on adding the patch to glibc this week-end, and
> currently adding it to the hurd package now.
So this patch is now allowed in glibc, fine! Or is it only Debian?
> Good news is: as hoped, icon now passes the testsuite fine!
>
> I'm finalizing the patches, will upload the hurd package, eglibc
> will build, then rebuild hurd, and then icon should build fine, then
> ifupdown.
Good news indeed. Congratulations!