[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Questions about patches for hurdselect.c
From: |
Svante Signell |
Subject: |
Questions about patches for hurdselect.c |
Date: |
Fri, 07 Dec 2012 17:13:00 +0100 |
Hello,
In the works of rewriting hurdselect.c I have some question on how to
write patches. The changed code contains three parts:
1) Introducing three cases: DELAY, POLL, and SELECT
2) Removing the unneeded code for each case statement
3) Rewriting the poll case to be compliant with POSIX
Doing the first part makes a diff with the original code not so useful,
especially when the second part has been done. I have the following
questions:
Q1) Should I still send the new code in patch format?
Q2) Should there be three patches, one for each change?
Q3) Part 3) is not yet finished, Should I wait until it is complete?
- Questions about patches for hurdselect.c,
Svante Signell <=
- Re: Questions about patches for hurdselect.c, Samuel Thibault, 2012/12/07
- Re: Questions about patches for hurdselect.c, Svante Signell, 2012/12/07
- Re: Questions about patches for hurdselect.c, Svante Signell, 2012/12/12
- Re: Questions about patches for hurdselect.c, Samuel Thibault, 2012/12/16
- Re: Questions about patches for hurdselect.c, Svante Signell, 2012/12/17
- Re: Questions about patches for hurdselect.c, Samuel Thibault, 2012/12/17
- Re: Questions about patches for hurdselect.c, Svante Signell, 2012/12/17
- Re: Questions about patches for hurdselect.c, Samuel Thibault, 2012/12/17
- Re: Questions about patches for hurdselect.c, Richard Braun, 2012/12/17
- Re: Questions about patches for hurdselect.c, Svante Signell, 2012/12/17