[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] simplify ulimit implementation
From: |
Pino Toscano |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] simplify ulimit implementation |
Date: |
Tue, 15 Jan 2013 19:17:06 +0100 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.2.0-4-amd64; KDE/4.8.4; x86_64; ; ) |
Hi,
Alle lunedì 19 novembre 2012, Roland McGrath ha scritto:
> I don't think losing __UL_GETMAXBRK is really a problem. The reason
> for removing it was not specific to Linux, just to the
> implementation being in a shared library. It could be implemented
> in a shared library, at the cost of a GOT reloc for _etext to get
> the main executable's value (or conversely, perhaps some grovelling
> in dynamic linker data structures for the shared case). But given
> that the current implementation usable on the Hurd will yield
> utterly useless values, the case for having it at all is
> inordinately weak.
OK.
Attached there are the two patches of the ulimit reorganization, as you
suggested in a previous email:
1) move the linux implementation as posix (including limits.h)
2) remove the bsd implementation
Thanks,
--
Pino Toscano
fix-ulimit-1.diff
Description: Text Data
fix-ulimit-2.diff
Description: Text Data
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
- Re: [PATCH] simplify ulimit implementation,
Pino Toscano <=