bug-hurd
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH, HURD][RFC] hurdselect: Step7x, almost complete rewrite finis


From: Pino Toscano
Subject: Re: [PATCH, HURD][RFC] hurdselect: Step7x, almost complete rewrite finished
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2013 00:19:06 +0100
User-agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.2.0-4-amd64; KDE/4.8.4; x86_64; ; )

Alle mercoledì 13 febbraio 2013, Samuel Thibault ha scritto:
> Pino Toscano, le Wed 13 Feb 2013 00:08:21 +0100, a écrit :
> > Alle mercoledì 13 febbraio 2013, Svante Signell ha scritto:
> > > On Tue, 2013-02-12 at 23:52 +0100, Pino Toscano wrote:
> > > > Alle martedì 12 febbraio 2013, Svante Signell ha scritto:
> > > > >  * change the FD_SETSIZE upper value check to larger than or
> > > > >  equal
> > > > > 
> > > > > from larger than.
> > > > > (from POSIX definition of select:
> > > > > http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009604499/functions/sele
> > > > > ct.h tml )
> > > > 
> > > > It's
> > > > http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/functions/selec
> > > > t.ht ml
> > > > 
> > > >  actually, and it says:
> > > > |[EINVAL]
> > > > |
> > > > |    The nfds argument is less than 0 or greater than
> > > > |    FD_SETSIZE.
> > > > 
> > > > and not "greater or equal than", so it allows FD_SETSIZE.
> > > > (And logically, if a fdset_t can contain at most FD_SETSIZE
> > > > fd's, you need to allow FD_SETSIZE as maximum number of fd's.)
> > > > 
> > > > Please remove this change, which is wrong.
> > > 
> > > Then you have to convince the Linux man page and the python3.2
> > > developers too. From python3.2:
> > > ./Include/fileobject.h: #define _PyIsSelectable_fd(FD) (((FD) >=
> > > 0) && ((FD) < FD_SETSIZE))
> > 
> > Feel free to open bugs about them, then.
> 
> That being said, for the python case they may prefer to stay on the
> safe side, and just not attempt to select FD_SETSIZE, in the case
> the OS has bugs that leaves it with the old standard.

Of course -- but then you either need to dig through history and check 
whether that was intended, or just an oversight; if no history about 
that is available or there's nothing pointing out at an intentional 
behaviour, then filing a bug will surely be the best way to let them 
know, and know about their idea on that.

-- 
Pino Toscano

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]