[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GCC GNAT (was: [SCM] Web pages branch, master, updated. 306f359688af
|
From: |
Svante Signell |
|
Subject: |
Re: GCC GNAT (was: [SCM] Web pages branch, master, updated. 306f359688afa254dc8728c73afab0fdb33d39ab) |
|
Date: |
Tue, 23 Apr 2013 16:02:50 +0200 |
On Tue, 2013-04-23 at 11:48 +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Tue, 19 Mar 2013 20:11:08 +0100, I wrote:
> > While indeed a basic port has been done
> > by Svante, there's still lots of work remaining that is worth more than
> > one GSoC. The port is not yet upstream: the maintainer raised some
> > concerns that I have not yet found the time to follow up on. While the
> > test results of the GCC/GNAT testsuite don't look bad (but there are a
> > few unresolved issues, and the testsuite appears to be a rather small
> > one), I don't know if the port has yet seen any real-world usage.
> > Svante, did you test it for any bigger Ada code bases, or any Ada
> > testsuites?
>
> Ping.
Thomas, I think all Ada-related Debian packages builds with the patched
gnat-4.6, at least the ones I tested. Maybe there are still some
patch(es) not yet applied due to the Wheezy freeze, I don't remember
right now.
Since I don't know of any testsuite outside Debian do you have links?
Furthermore, gnat-4.8 seem to be around. Has anybody tried to build it
build with the patches for 4.6?