Re: /hurd/init and /hurd/proc

bug-hurd

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: /hurd/init and /hurd/proc

From:	Roland McGrath
Subject:	Re: /hurd/init and /hurd/proc
Date:	Mon, 15 Jul 2013 09:44:52 -0700 (PDT)

They are separate because they do different things.  This doesn't seem like
it should need a lot of justification to Hurd hackers.  If you want to roll
things together just because you always run them both, maybe you should be
hacking on a monolithic kernel instead.

[Prev in Thread]

Current Thread

[Next in Thread]

Re: /hurd/init and /hurd/proc, Samuel Thibault, 2013/07/15
- Re: /hurd/init and /hurd/proc, Roland McGrath <=
  - Re: /hurd/init and /hurd/proc, Samuel Thibault, 2013/07/15
    - Re: /hurd/init and /hurd/proc, Roland McGrath, 2013/07/15
- kill (0, SIGSTOP) is freezing the system (was: /hurd/init and /hurd/proc), Justus Winter, 2013/07/24
  - [PATCH 2/7] hurd: add proc_mark_essential, Justus Winter, 2013/07/24
  - [PATCH 1/7] proc: add proc_mark_essential server code, Justus Winter, 2013/07/24
  - [PATCH 4/7] init: Build fixes, Justus Winter, 2013/07/24
  - [PATCH 3/7] init: Mark auth, proc and fs servers as essential, Justus Winter, 2013/07/24
  - [PATCH 6/7] proc: evil hack, mark all pids<100 essential, Justus Winter, 2013/07/24
  - [PATCH 5/7] proc: Fix miscalculation of count, Justus Winter, 2013/07/24
  - Re: kill (0, SIGSTOP) is freezing the system (was: /hurd/init and /hurd/proc), Samuel Thibault, 2013/07/24

Prev by Date: Re: GNU is almost 30
Next by Date: Re: /hurd/init and /hurd/proc
Previous by thread: Re: /hurd/init and /hurd/proc
Next by thread: Re: /hurd/init and /hurd/proc
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread