[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH 1/2] Port gdbserver to GNU/Hurd
From: |
Yue Lu |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH 1/2] Port gdbserver to GNU/Hurd |
Date: |
Mon, 9 Sep 2013 18:21:32 +0800 |
Hi,
On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 3:29 AM, Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com> wrote:
> I'm actually very excited to see gdb and gdbserver sharing
> a single target backend, even if we still have many wrinkles
> in the interfaces to iron out! It does looks like this way
> results in lots of less work, and makes me believe we can
> port other targets to gdbserver already without unsurmountable
> effort.
Do you mean there should be only one structure target_obj in both gdb
and gdbserver?
But I have found that, the structure has been declared different
between gdb and gdbserver, How can I integrate them into single one.
Or just I have got the wrong understand.
--
Yue Lu (陆岳)
- [Hurd/gnu-nat.c] Use ptid_t.lwpid to store, thread ids instead of ptid_t.tid. (was: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Port gdbserver to GNU/Hurd), (continued)
- [Hurd/gnu-nat.c] Use ptid_t.lwpid to store, thread ids instead of ptid_t.tid. (was: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Port gdbserver to GNU/Hurd), Pedro Alves, 2013/09/18
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] Port gdbserver to GNU/Hurd, Pedro Alves, 2013/09/18
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] Port gdbserver to GNU/Hurd, Yue Lu, 2013/09/22
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] Port gdbserver to GNU/Hurd, Pedro Alves, 2013/09/06
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] Port gdbserver to GNU/Hurd, Yue Lu, 2013/09/11
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] Port gdbserver to GNU/Hurd, Pedro Alves, 2013/09/18
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] Port gdbserver to GNU/Hurd, Pedro Alves, 2013/09/18
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] Port gdbserver to GNU/Hurd, Yue Lu, 2013/09/19
- FAIL: gdb.base/nextoverexit.exp: next over exit (the program exited) (was: [PATCH 1/2] Port gdbserver to GNU/Hurd), Thomas Schwinge, 2013/09/19
- Re: FAIL: gdb.base/nextoverexit.exp: next over exit (the program exited), Pedro Alves, 2013/09/19
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] Port gdbserver to GNU/Hurd,
Yue Lu <=